Atomic Server vs TypeDB

Both are other databases. Atomic Server (2020-08, MIT, Rust) ranks #20 this month; TypeDB (2016, MPL-2.0, Rust) ranks #9.

Attribute Atomic Server #20 ▼12 Strong TypeDB #9 ▲3 Strong
At a glance
Rank #20#9
Score 58.863.6
GitHub stars 1.6k4.4k
Popularity 57.968.7
Activity 75.777.7
Community 44.566.4
Research 75.049.6
Fundamentals
Description A lightweight Rust graph database built around the Atomic Data specification. Provides event-sourced versioning, hierarchical authorization, and real-time sync via WebSockets.A polymorphic database that natively models inheritance hierarchies, dependencies, and conceptual schemas using its TypeQL query language. Supports clustering for scalability and a cloud-agnostic deployment model.
Vendor OntolaVaticle
Model OtherOther
Kind databasedatabase
Category EmergingGrowing
First released 2020-082016
Status activeactive
License MITMPL-2.0
Written in RustRust
Query languages Custom APITypeQL
gdotv support nono

Feature scores — not surveyed for Atomic Server

Feature Atomic ServerTypeDB
Community & Business
Active development
Commercial support
Live community
Open Source
Pricing
Trendiness
Deployment
Containerization
Work as dedicated instance
Work as embedded ·
Testing in-memory version
Platform
Operating on Linux
Operating on Windows
SaaS offering
Operations
Automatic updates ·
Client side caching ·
Data versioning support ·
Live backups ·
Distribution
Cluster Re-balancing ·
Data Distribution ·
High-Availability
Query Distribution
Replication support
Developer Experience
Data types defined 0.5
Logging/Auditing
Object-Graph Mapper ·
Reactive programming
Documentation up-to-date
Binary protocol
CLI
GUI
Data Model
Multi-database ·
Graph-native data ·
REST API ·
Query Language 0.5
Transactions
Granular locking ·
Multiple isolation levels 0.5
Read committed transaction
Transaction support
Schema & Security
Constraints
Schema support
Secondary indexes
Server side procedures ·
Triggers
Authentication
Authorization
Data encryption ·