FalkorDB vs TuringDB

Both are property graph databases queried with openCypher. FalkorDB (2018-07, SSPL-1.0, C) ranks #6 this month; TuringDB (2025, BUSL-1.1, C++) ranks #53.

Attribute FalkorDB #6 ▼2 Strong TuringDB #53 = Growing
At a glance
Rank #6#53
Score 64.649.5
GitHub stars 5.8k180
Popularity 63.141.9
Activity 80.082.2
Community 72.152.2
Research 54.349.6
Fundamentals
Description A property graph database that runs as a Redis module, formerly RedisGraph. Uses GraphBLAS sparse matrix operations for query execution, enabling parallel graph traversal.An in-memory, column-oriented property graph database engine focused on analytical and read-intensive workloads over large graphs.
Vendor FalkorDBTuring Biosystems
Model Property GraphProperty Graph
Kind databasedatabase
Category EstablishedEmerging
First released 2018-072025
Status activeactive
License SSPL-1.0BUSL-1.1
Written in CC++
Query languages openCypheropenCypher
gdotv support yesno

Feature scores — not surveyed for TuringDB

Feature FalkorDBTuringDB
Community & Business
Active development
Commercial support
Live community
Open Source
Pricing
Trendiness 0.5
Deployment
Containerization
Work as dedicated instance
Work as embedded ·
Testing in-memory version
Platform
Operating on Linux
Operating on Windows 0.75
SaaS offering ·
Operations
Automatic updates ·
Client side caching 0.5
Data versioning support ·
Live backups 0.5
Distribution
Cluster Re-balancing ·
Data Distribution ·
High-Availability 0.5
Query Distribution ·
Replication support
Developer Experience
Data types defined
Logging/Auditing 0.5
Object-Graph Mapper
Reactive programming 0.5
Documentation up-to-date
Binary protocol
CLI
GUI ·
Data Model
Multi-database ·
Graph-native data
REST API
Query Language
Transactions
Granular locking ·
Multiple isolation levels ·
Read committed transaction ·
Transaction support
Schema & Security
Constraints
Schema support ·
Secondary indexes
Server side procedures
Triggers 0.5
Authentication 0.5
Authorization 0.5
Data encryption 0.5