Oxigraph vs Stardog

Both are rdf databases queried with SPARQL. Oxigraph (2020-08, Apache-2.0 OR MIT, Rust) ranks #24 this month; Stardog (2011, Proprietary, Java) ranks #23.

Attribute Oxigraph #24 ▼2 Strong Stardog #23 ▲3 Strong
At a glance
Rank #24#23
Score 57.257.4
GitHub stars 1.9k
Popularity 67.254.6
Activity 70.799.1
Community 37.035.3
Research 63.249.6
Fundamentals
Description An RDF triple store written in Rust and built on RocksDB. Available as a standalone server, embeddable library, and via Python and JavaScript bindings.An RDF-based knowledge graph database with OWL 2 reasoning and property graph extensions. Includes Voicebox, an OpenAI-compatible natural language query interface via LLM integration.
Vendor Oxigraph CommunityStardog Union
Model RDFRDF
Kind databasedatabase
Category EmergingEnterprise
First released 2020-082011
Status activeactive
License Apache-2.0 OR MITProprietary
Written in RustJava
Query languages SPARQLSPARQL, SQL, GraphQL
gdotv support yesyes

Feature scores — not surveyed for Oxigraph

Feature OxigraphStardog
Community & Business
Active development 0.5
Commercial support
Live community
Open Source ·
Pricing ·
Trendiness
Deployment
Containerization
Work as dedicated instance
Work as embedded ·
Testing in-memory version ·
Platform
Operating on Linux
Operating on Windows ·
SaaS offering
Operations
Automatic updates ·
Client side caching ·
Data versioning support ·
Live backups
Distribution
Cluster Re-balancing ·
Data Distribution ·
High-Availability
Query Distribution
Replication support
Developer Experience
Data types defined 0.5
Logging/Auditing
Object-Graph Mapper ·
Reactive programming
Documentation up-to-date
Binary protocol ·
CLI
GUI
Data Model
Multi-database
Graph-native data ·
REST API
Query Language
Transactions
Granular locking
Multiple isolation levels
Read committed transaction ·
Transaction support
Schema & Security
Constraints
Schema support
Secondary indexes
Server side procedures
Triggers ·
Authentication
Authorization
Data encryption ·