LadybugDB vs Neo4j

Both are property graph databases queried with openCypher. LadybugDB (2025-11, MIT, C++) ranks #8 this month; Neo4j (2007, GPL-3.0, Java) ranks #1.

Attribute LadybugDB #8 ▼3 Strong Neo4j #1 = Leader
At a glance
Rank #8#1
Score 63.683.3
GitHub stars 1.7k17.2k
Popularity 67.197.3
Activity 71.686.7
Community 79.890.2
Research 49.698.6
Fundamentals
Description A community fork of Kuzu. An embedded columnar property graph database for analytical workloads, with openCypher support, vector indices, and full-text search.A property graph database that stores data as fixed-size records in linked lists for index-free adjacency traversal. Offers community and commercial editions with an extensive graph algorithms library.
Vendor LadybugDBNeo4j Inc
Model Property GraphProperty Graph
Kind embeddeddatabase
Category GrowingEstablished
First released 2025-112007
Status activeactive
License MITGPL-3.0
Written in C++Java
Query languages openCypherCypher, GQL
gdotv support yesyes

Feature scores — not surveyed for LadybugDB

Feature LadybugDBNeo4j
Community & Business
Active development
Commercial support
Live community
Open Source
Pricing 0.5
Trendiness
Deployment
Containerization
Work as dedicated instance
Work as embedded
Testing in-memory version
Platform
Operating on Linux
Operating on Windows
SaaS offering
Operations
Automatic updates ·
Client side caching ·
Data versioning support ·
Live backups
Distribution
Cluster Re-balancing ·
Data Distribution
High-Availability
Query Distribution
Replication support
Developer Experience
Data types defined
Logging/Auditing
Object-Graph Mapper
Reactive programming
Documentation up-to-date
Binary protocol
CLI
GUI
Data Model
Multi-database
Graph-native data
REST API
Query Language
Transactions
Granular locking
Multiple isolation levels
Read committed transaction
Transaction support
Schema & Security
Constraints
Schema support
Secondary indexes
Server side procedures
Triggers
Authentication
Authorization
Data encryption ·